The state of Jammu and Kashmir, bordering India and Pakistan, has decided to remain independent. She offered to sign status quo agreements with both gentlemen. Pakistan immediately agreed, but India called for further talks. According to K.M Munshi, appointed India`s general agent in Hyderabad, the Indians felt that the conclusion of a status quo agreement with Hyderabad meant that India had lost control of Hyderabad`s affairs. The Hyderabad State Congress opposed it because it was seen by the Indian government as a sign of weakness.  V. P. Menon stated that Nizam and his advisers viewed the agreement as a respite from which Indian troops would be withdrawn and the state could establish its position to maintain its independence.  AND CONSIDERING that it is advantageous for both parties that existing agreements and administrative arrangements be maintained in matters of common interest until one of the above final agreements: on 29 November 1947, the Indian government signed a status quo agreement with the Nizam of Hyderabad, which decided to give both parties one year to reach an amicable solution. Nizam privately hoped that he could continue as an independent sovereign.
Plan B is expected to make Hyderabad part of Pakistan. Both draft treaties were submitted to the House on 25 July. A state negotiating committee was formed, which reviewed the two agreements, consisting of ten leaders and twelve ministers. After discussion, the Committee finalized the two draft agreements on 31 July.  Hyderabad violated all the terms of the agreement: in foreign affairs, by carrying out intrigues with Pakistan, to which it secretly lent 15 million pounds; in defence, by building a large semi-military army; communication, through interventions in border traffic and transit traffic of Indian railways.  India has also been accused of violating the agreement by imposing an economic blockade. It turns out that the State of Bombay unknowingly intervened from Delhi in deliveries to Hyderabad. The government has promised to take it with the provincial governments, but scholar Lucien Benichou says it has never been done.
India also delayed India`s arms deliveries to Hyderabad, which was later de affirmed as a violation of the status quo agreement.  As a result, the Indian government proposed a status quo agreement in Hyderabad ensuring that the status quo would be maintained and that no military action would be taken for a year. Under the agreement, India would deal with Hyderabad`s foreign policy, but Indian forces deployed in Secunderabad would be withdrawn.  In the city of Hyderabad, in October 1947, there was a large demonstration in Razakars led by Syed Qasim Razvi against the government`s decision to sign the breastfeeding agreement. The demonstration in front of the homes of Prime Minister Nawab von Chattari, Councillor, Sir Walter Monckton and Minister Nawab Ali Nawaz Jung, the main negotiators, forced them to interrupt their visit to Delhi to sign the agreement on that date.  On 15 August, the State of Junagadh implemented the accession instrument and the status quo agreement with Pakistan. It was adopted by Pakistan on 13 September.  Junagadh was the only state to declare membership in Pakistan until 15 August.  The status quo agreement was separate from the accession instrument formulated at about the same time by the United States Department, which was a legal document including a transfer of sovereignty to the extent defined in the instrument.  Some indigenous leaders of the Principality tried to buy time by declaring that they would sign the status quo agreement, but not the accession instrument until they had time to make up their minds. In response, the Indian government considered that it would only sign status quo agreements with the states that joined the Union.  Until August 15, 1947, the agreed date and date of India`s independence, all but four princely states, which are Indian, signed about 560 of them, both the accession instrument and the status quo agreement with India.